The successful implementation of European Court of Human Rights judgments in Croatia remains a complex challenge despite some progress. Implementing ECtHR judgments, particularly those concerning general measures, reveals systemic obstacles. Although the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of ten accepts the implemented measures, their actual implementation at the national level is often incomplete or inadequate, indicating a need for further efforts to achieve full compliance with ECtHR judgments. One of the key challenges for the Government of the Republic of Croatia and the national mechanism for implementing the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, with an emphasis on the transparency and visibility of the Office of the Agent of the Republic of Croatia before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, is the insufficiently transparent and developed communication and cooperation between different stakeholders involved in executing judgments. A systemic response to systemic problems requires a synergistic approach that includes not only government institutions and public administration bodies but also the judiciary, civil society organizations, the academic community, and ultimately, the parliament. The lack of regular and structured dialogue with the participation of experts and the wider public, along with the lack of reporting to the Croatian Parliament, results in a fragmented approach that leads to the absence of transformative effects of the application of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on the legal framework and society as a whole. The lack of transparency and clearly articulated responsibility of the bodies and institutions that caused the violation of the Convention in the process of execution of ECtHR judgments also represents a significant challenge. The lack of publicly available information on the steps taken in implementing ECtHR judgments, as well as the limited possibility of participation of civil society organizations in monitoring and evaluating implementation, undermines public trust in the effectiveness of human rights protection mechanisms. Strengthening the capacity of civil society organizations to monitor and report on the 3 implementation of judgments, while ensuring access to information, is crucial for improving this process and strengthening public accountability. Raising public awareness of ECtHR judgments and their importance for protecting human rights in Croatia is also crucial. Insufficient knowledge of the standards of the Convention and how they are applied domestically represents an obstacle to creating a culture of respect for the rule of law. Educating citizens about their rights and protection mechanisms, as well as promoting dialogue on the importance of human rights, are necessary to create a social climate that supports implementing ECtHR judgments and encourages the active participation of citizens in protecting human rights.